章八・零（Chapter 8.0）
What Changes
「終わりではない。始まりの終わりである。」
This is not the end. It is the end of the beginning.
8.0.1 What This Work Has Achieved
Beginning from the minimal requirement that difference be possible, we have constructed:
- A pre-spatial substrate (CTS)
- Asymmetric collapse as the source of distinction
- Direction as consistent ordering
- Memory as recursive reference
- Locking as self-sustaining stability
- Space as the capacity for coexistence
Space has been derived, not assumed.
8.0.2 What Can No Longer Be Said
After this construction, certain claims become unjustified:
“Space is fundamental.”
No. Space is emergent from recursive collapse structure.
“Space is a background.”
No. Space is a capacity that required construction.
“Space is obvious.”
No. Space required six stages of logical development.
“We can start physics with geometry.”
No. Geometry comes after space, and space comes after collapse.
8.0.3 The Burden Shifts
Previously, those who claimed space was emergent bore the burden of proof.
Now, the burden shifts.
Anyone claiming space is fundamental must explain:
- Why the construction in this book is wrong
- What prevents space from being derived this way
- What additional evidence supports spatial fundamentality
The default position has changed.
8.0.4 What Remains Open
This work does not answer everything.
Open questions include:
- The relationship between CTS collapse and quantum measurement
- How time emerges alongside space
- Whether CTS is unique or one of multiple possible substrates
- Quantitative predictions from collapse-derived geometry
These are proper subjects for future work.
8.0.5 The Closed Ascent
The ascent from CTS to space is now closed.
Each step was forced by contradiction. Each structure appeared because its absence was untenable.
The ascent cannot be shortened. It cannot be reordered. It cannot be bypassed.
This is not one possible path to space. It is the necessary path.
「空は説明された。これ以上、語らない。」
Space has been explained. Say no more.
Intent-Tensor-Theory 